Picky-shy model of dating apps

This is the final post (at least for the foreseeable future) on the statistical physics of dating apps [1]. In this post we will introduce two types of the users: some of them will be picky (giving likes predominantly to more attractive users), while some of them will be shy (giving likes predominantly to less attractive users). Who is more successful?

Was 2022 as good as 2021?

Well, at least it was as productive on Physics of Risk blog. Though with less focus with quite a few assorted posts. In a few a bit longer series of posts we have taken a look at three papers I have found interesting. [1] inspired few posts on traffic. [2] inspired couple posts on biology. Exploration of [3] continues in series of posts on dating apps.

Number of posts written in English and still available on this siteFig 1.The number of posts written in English and still available on this iteration of Physics of Risk. The wide bars represent total number of posts for each year since 2010, while the narrower bars represent a number of posts with 'Interactive models' tag.

Once again, at the time of writing this post, I still do not have an idea what we will have in store for 2023. Obviously, we will finish dating apps series. And then we will have a few more assorted posts?

References

Numberphile: Stable Marriage Problem

In this Numberphile video Dr. Emily Riehl introduces stable marriage problem.

Practical applications of Gale-Shapley algorithm are much less romantic. Variations of the algorithm is used to, for example, optimize assignment of users to servers in content delivery networks. Similarly optimal matchings are often need in economic and management sciences. In fact, L. Shapley was awarded Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics in 2012 (together with A. Roth) for the theory of stable allocations. One of the most well known examples of this is matching graduating medical students to their first hospital appointments.